SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Najpopularniejsze domeny dla Twojej firmy w nazwa.pl (reklama)
Myślisz o zdobyciu zagranicznych rynków? Chcesz mieć adresy WWW w najbardziej rozpoznawalnych domenach? A może chciałbyś zabezpieczyć swoją markę przed wykorzystaniem jej przez kogoś innego? Powinieneś więc rozważyć rejestrację firmowych adresów WWW zawierających najpopularniejsze rozszerzenia używane na świecie.

 

147122414797_555060007965Sevrin Robstad

 
102327064043_530260007145Message not availabl

 
173921594443_547360007965Molle Bestefich

 
119328904375_513560007113Francois Barre
On Monday July 17, quackyo@xxxxxxxx wrote: I have written some posts about this before... My 6 disk RAID 5 broke down because of hardware failure. When I tried to get it upnrunning again I did

 
106924594191_557060007686Francois Barre

 
199429724928_579060007548Tuomas Leikola

 
175425454253_579860007352Jeff Breidenbach

 
194325864512_538660007300Jeff Breidenbach

 
135122524190_572660007852Bill Davidsen

 
184024574310_503060007812Neil Brown
Hi all, I have a RAID6 array where a disk went bad. I removed the old disk, put in an identical one, and repartitioned the new disk. I am now trying to add the new partition to the array, but I

 
171620204784_564360007305Neil Brown
Thanks for the reply, Neil. Here is my version: [root@paul log]# mdadm --version mdadm - v2.3.1 - 6 February 2006 This is a somewhat production system, running Fedora Core 5. Official packages co

 
119125654850_544460007697Neil Brown
Please, please! I am dead in the water! To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5 system, using /dev/hd[acdeg] 2 and /dev/sd[ab]2. /dev/hdd went bad so I replaced the drive and tried to ad

 
179723054282_530860007341Paul Waldo
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:25, Neil Brown wrote: On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Please, please! I am dead in the water! To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5

 
160920414594_579960007983Paul Waldo
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: At this point, Id just be happy to be able to get the degraded array back up and running. Is there any way to do that? Thanks! mdadm --as

 
165126064440_596160007467Paul Waldo

 
177323524488_555660007298Paul Waldo

 
186121864863_571160007225Dan Graham
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Here is the dmesg output. No log files are created with the FC5 rescue disk. Thanks! On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:59, Neil Brown wrote:

 
140724274530_569060007220Paul Clements
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Dan Graham wrote: Hello; I have an existing, active ext3 filesystem which I would like to convert to a RAID 1 ext3 filesystem with minimal down time. After casting about

 
103023444262_562560007028Robert Heinzmann
Paul Clements wrote: Is 16 blocks a large enough area? Maybe. The superblock will be between 64KB and 128KB from the end of the partition. This depends on the size of the partition:

 
160727934635_504760007271Paul Waldo
Still no joy after zeroing the superblock, Mikael. :-( [root@paul ~]# mdadm --examine /dev/hdd2 /dev/hdd2: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 00.90.00 UUID : 2e316d9e:20cac82a

 
151525264624_500260007619Neil Brown
Hi i have small problem when i booting i have md1 as /boot md2 as swap and md3 as / (root) and when it come to md3 it say something like "md3 has no identity information" i cant read it

 
130029434806_516360007436linuxmania lizhi
A client of mine desperately wants a Dell solution rather than a self-build. They are looking at an external Dell box with 15 x 500GB SATA drives in it and a Dell 1U host controller - but the connec

 
138820604864_591860007599linuxmania lizhi
On Thursday July 13, linuxmania.lizhi@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Hi all, Im new to MD RAID. When I read the book "Understanding the Linux Kernel", I know that there are several layers between Fil

 
113827814943_540060007085Gordon Henderson
Last year, there were discussions on this list about the possible use of a co-processor (Intels IOP333) to compute raid 5/6s parity data. We are about to see low cost, multi core cpu chips with very

 
142920124879_506360007632Burn Alting

 
133525754158_595960007240Andrew Skolarz

 
157728784182_538260007836Andrew Skolarz

 
181924294896_568260007646Andrew Skolarz
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 06:10 schrieben Sie: Care to enlighten the rest of us what did the trick? Dex please disregard this email .. after doing more google research i have re-assembled the

 
128024854426_522360007832Justin Piszcz
On Tuesday July 11, pletopia@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Checksum : 4aa9094a - expected 4aa908c4 This is a bit scary. You have a single-bit error, either in the checksum or elsewhere in the superbloc

 
130823134845_518660007905Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Neil, It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l? Is t

 
181927124479_597760007055Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Neil, It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l? Is t

 
121622474933_539960007974David Greaves

 
123424494402_512960007749David Greaves

 
177524114233_520160007118Vladimir Strycek
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL? GPL. Ill make that

 
103229434432_587760007810Vladimir Strycek
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL? GPL. Ill make that

 
178229484522_526060007192Mario BitKoenig Holb
Hello Vladimir, Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote: VS Hi, VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical VS 200GB hdd VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks

 
131521414440_524860007070Mario BitKoenig Holb
Hello Vladimir, Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote: VS Hi, VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical VS 200GB hdd VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks

 
122227744519_562560007650Neil Brown

 
137326794060_560760007695Tejun Heo

 
172629144638_515760007767Bill Davidsen
On Tuesday July 11, htejun@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Christian Pernegger wrote: The fact that the disk had changed minor numbers after it was plugged back in bugs me a bit. (was sdc before, sde afte

 
196825724714_548960007639Justin Piszcz

 
168121474780_512160007319Justin Piszcz

 
119126184093_571060007998Christian Pernegger

 
135926164677_541960007557Molle Bestefich
Hi! I created a sw-raid md0 and a LVM above with four 250GB Samsung SATA disks a couple of months ago. I am not an raid expert but I thought I could handle it with a little help of my friends from g

 
111429494470_575260007261Henrik Holst
Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich <at gmail.com writes: From the paste bin: 443: root <at ned ~ # mdadm --examine /dev/sd[abcd] Shows that all 4 devices are ACTIVE SYNC....

 
151820734833_523260007665Karl Voit
Henrik Holst <henrik.holst <at idgmail.se writes: Karl Voit wrote: [snip] Well this is because of the false(?) superblocks of sda-sdd in comparison to sda1 to sdd1. I dont

 
187222434812_565160007207Karl Voit

 
197125554826_506360007068Karl Voit

 
106126244685_573860007909Karl Voit

 
129521574857_576660007964Karl Voit

 

 

home   |    register   |    login